Legal Opinion

In re MH 2008-001188

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided March 26, 2009No. 1 CA-MH 08-0033PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DOWNIE, Judge.

¶ 1 Appellant challenges the superior court's determination that she was unwilling or unable to accept voluntary mental health treatment. She also contends that documentation submitted by the evaluating physicians failed to comply with statutory requirements because it did not specifically allege that she was unwilling or unable to accept voluntary *178treatment. Finally, appellant claims that the superior court failed to make necessary findings on the record. For the following reasons, we affirm.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

I. Petition for Court-Ordered Evaluation

¶ 2 On May…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In Re the Appeal in Maricopa County of Mental Health Case No. MH 94-00592Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1995
  2. In Re the Appeal in Maricopa County, Juvenile Action No. JS-734Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1975
  3. In Re the Appeal in Pima County Mental Health Service Action No. MH-1140-6-93.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1993
  4. In Re the Commitment of an Alleged Mentally Disordered PersonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1985

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. In Re the Commitment of Wilfredo JaramilloCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2012
  2. In Re Mh 2008-002393Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
  3. In Re PIMA COUNTY MENTAL HEALTH NO. MH20130801Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2015
  4. In Re Thomas R.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2010
  5. In Re Mh Xxxx-XxxxxxCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API