In Re Mh 2008-002393
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DOWNIE, Judge.
¶ 1 Appellant seeks reversal of the superi- or court’s order for involuntary mental health treatment. For the following reasons, we affirm and hold that the remedy for a patient held for evaluation in excess of statutory timeframes is to seek release during the period of illegal detention, not dismissal of a subsequently filed involuntary treatment proceeding that complies with legal requirements.
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
¶ 2 We view the facts in the light most favorable to affirming the superior court’s judgment. 1 In re MH 2008-001188, 221 Ariz. 177, 179, ¶ 14, 211…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Englert v. Carondelet Health NetworkCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2000
- In Re Maricopa County Superior Court Number MH 2001-001139Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2002
- In Re the Appeal in Maricopa County of Mental Health Case No. MH 94-00592Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1995
- In re Sabino R.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2000
- Michael D. v. Deer Valley Unified School District No. 97Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1996
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- In Re Pinal County Mental Health No. Mh-201000076Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2010
- In Re Pinal County Mental Health No. Mh201000076Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2010