Legal Opinion
National Surety Co. v. Wittich
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided July 3, 1931No. 28,399PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLoring, J.
Defendants prevailed in an action to set aside a transfer of real estate as fraudulent as to creditors. The court denied plaintiff’s motion for a new trial, and the case comes here on an appeal by plaintiff from the judgment subsequently entered.
Defendant A. S. Wittich was postmaster at Kelly Lake, St. Louis county, and on July 20, 1918, the plaintiff became a surety on his bond to the United States. In March, 1920, he sold his store and removed to Duluth. Barney Carrón was appointed acting postmaster but never qualified. Wittich’s successor did not qualify until early in 1921. A government…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Thompson v. SchiekSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
- National Surety Co. v. WittichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
- Schmitz v. WenzelSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
- Steinke-Seidl Lumber Co. v. NewdallSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
3Cited by5 opinions
- Finn v. Alliance BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2015
- Kummet v. ThielenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1941
- Farmers Co-Operative Assn. of Bertha v. KotzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1946
- Kelley v. Associated Bank (In re Petters Co.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Minnesota · 2016
- Patrick Finn and Lighthouse Management Group, Inc., Appellants/Cross-Respondents v. Alliance Bank, Respondent/Cross-Appellant, Home Federal Bank, Respondent/Cross-Appellant, KleinBank, Respondent/Cross-Appellant, Merchant's Bank, Respondent/Cross-Appellant, M&I Marshall & Ilsley Bank, Respondent/Cross-Appellant, American Bank of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2015