Legal Opinion

Steinke-Seidl Lumber Co. v. Newdall

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 5, 1931No. 28,425PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilson, C. J.

Plaintiff appealed from an adverse judgment. It has two judgments against Magnus Newdall. In each debtor bought building material on credit and. used the same in the improvement of an 80-acre farm, which was debtor’s homestead. Upon each account, with the exception of a few items, plaintiff under art. 1, § 12, of our state constitution could have resorted to the homestead for payment of the indebtedness.

Partial payments were^made upon the account; plaintiff took notes for the balance; and the notes were reduced to judgments without the record in the action showing what the consideration of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Schlecht v. SchlechtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
  2. McNally v. WeldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1883
  3. Baker v. TerrellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1863
  4. National Pole & Treating Co. v. GilkeySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
  5. Ryan v. SimmsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1920

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Kummet v. ThielenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1941
  2. National Surety Co. v. WittichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API