Legal Opinion
National Surety Co. v. Wittich
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided July 10, 1931No. 28,484PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLoring, J.
The plaintiff prevailed in an action as a creditor to set aside as fraudulent the transfer' in September, 1920, of a ten-acre tract near Duluth from the defendant A. S. Wittich to his wife, Grace Wittich. There was no motion for a new trial. The appeal is from the judgment.
The land involved was acquired by Wittich in 1914. In 1918 the plaintiff became a surety on Wittich’s bond as postmaster at Kelly Lake, Minnesota. In September, 1920, he became involved in diffi- eulties with his wife over his relations with a young woman. His wife contemplated leaving him, and, as she says, they were…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- United States v. National Surety Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Jenkins v. National Surety Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Wetherill v. CanneySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1895
- Barrett Bros. Co. v. County of St. LouisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
- Underleak v. ScottSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1912
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Vinlis Construction Co. v. RoreckNew York Supreme Court · 1971
- Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. DahlSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1938
- In re Petters Co.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Minnesota · 2013
- Finn v. Alliance BankCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2013
- National Surety Co. v. WittichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1932
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.