Lay v. United States
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
KING, Senior Judge:
This matter is before the court on the appeal of Brown and Lay after conviction of distribution of controlled substance, heroin, in violation of D.C.Code § 33-541(a)(l) (1981).1 While Brown raises a number of issues, Lay only claims that the evidence was insufficient to support his conviction. With one exception, all of the issues presented can be resolved summarily as set forth in Part III, infra. Only Brown’s challenge to the trial court’s denial of his request to be present at the bench during the voir dire of the potential jurors re*1018quires a more extensive discussion.…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- People v. AntommarchiNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
- United States v. Myrtle D. Washington, (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1983
- United States v. Ruben Feliciano, AKA Rude Dog, AKA Roob Dog, Ronald Pagan, AKA Twin, and Nelson Gonzalez, AKA Snoop,defendants-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
- Gary v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Fortune v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2013
- State v. W.A.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2005
- Brown v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
- Hager v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2013
- Lay v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2003
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.