Legal Opinion
Lay v. United States
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided September 18, 2003No. 99-CF-947, 99-CF-1675Published
1Opinion of the Court
831 A.2d 1015 (2003)
Thomas L. LAY and Benjamin Brown, Appellants,
v.
UNITED STATES, Appellee.
No. 99-CF-947, 99-CF-1675.
District of Columbia Court of Appeals.
Argued February 13, 2003.
Decided September 18, 2003.
Thomas T. Heslep, Alexandria, VA, appointed by the court, for appellant Lay.
Thoms P. Lydon, appointed by the court, for appellant Brown.
David B. Goodhand, Assistant United States Attorney, with whom Roscoe C. Howard, Jr., United States Attorney, and John R. Fisher, Roy W. McLeese III, and Karen L. Melnik, Assistant United States Attorneys, were on the brief, for appellee.
Before WAGNER,…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- People v. AntommarchiNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
- United States v. Myrtle D. Washington, (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1983
- United States v. Ruben Feliciano, AKA Rude Dog, AKA Roob Dog, Ronald Pagan, AKA Twin, and Nelson Gonzalez, AKA Snoop,defendants-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
- Gary v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.