Legal Opinion
United States v. Myrtle D. Washington, (Two Cases)
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided April 15, 1983No. 82-1591, 82-1593PublishedCited by 159 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
PER CURIAM. PER CURIAM:
Appellant challenges the validity of her convictions following two indictments for making false statements to secure United States passports, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1542 (1976). Several arguments are proffered in support of her appeal. We find some merit in only one, involving her right under Fed.R.Crim.P. 43(a) to be present during the impaneling of the jury, which was violated when she was excluded over her express objection from a part of the confidential voir dire of several prospective jurors conducted at the bench. Nevertheless, we find that the…
2Cases cited50 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- United States v. CalandraSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Johnson v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Illinois v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by159 opinions
- United States v. GagnonSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Maddox v. LoveCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
- State v. PhillipsOhio Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. RiceWashington Supreme Court · 1988
- United States v. Ruben Feliciano, AKA Rude Dog, AKA Roob Dog, Ronald Pagan, AKA Twin, and Nelson Gonzalez, AKA Snoop,defendants-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
154 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.