Legal Opinion

Solomon v. Shewitz

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 19, 1915No. Docket No. 62PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Appeal from Wayne; Mandell, J. Bill by Harry R. Solomon against Jacob Shewitz and others to quiet title to real property. From a decree for complainant, defendant Shewitz appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.

The facts in this case are somewhat involved. On January 16, 1913, the title to the premises (consisting of 2% lots in Hunt & Leggett’s subdivision of certain lands in the city of Detroit) was in John W. Leggett. Mr. Leggett had previously given Justice R. Pierson an option to purchase said premises, which option would expire some time in March, 1913. While this option was in force, and on January 16, 1913, the agreement (Exhibit 2) was made by Justice R.. Pierson with Jacob Shewitz, as follows:

“Memorandum of agreement, made and entered into this 16th day of January, 1913, by and between…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Rust v. ConradMichigan Supreme Court · 1882
  2. Daily v. LitchfieldMichigan Supreme Court · 1862
  3. Phillips v. StauchMichigan Supreme Court · 1870
  4. Richmond v. RobinsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1864
  5. Kukatli v. JacksonOregon Supreme Court · 1911

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Zaher v. MiotkeMichigan Court of Appeals · 2013
  2. Detwiler v. CaponeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
  3. Waller v. LiebermanMichigan Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Schneidau v. ManleySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1944
  5. Crutchfield v. GriffinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API