Legal Opinion

Goodenow v. Curtis

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 11, 1876PublishedCited by 20 opinions

Appeal in Chancery from Calhoun Circuit.

1Opinion of the Court

Campbell, J:

This is the third litigation in this court arising out of the sale of certain hotel premises in Albion. The present controversy arises out of an attempt to foreclose a purchase money mortgage, which Goodenow claims should be restrained; first, because a condition precedent remains unperformed, and second, because of an alleged alteration in the note secured by the mortgage. The decision in the court below was in favor of Curtis on the main issue, and is appealed from by Goodenow.

The condition referred to arose out of an apparent defect in- the title. Two thousand dollars of the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Curtis v. GoodenowMichigan Supreme Court · 1871

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Epps v. 4 Quarters Restoration LLCMichigan Supreme Court · 2015
  2. Cunningham v. Commissioner of BanksMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1924
  3. Brooke v. StruthersMichigan Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Peterson v. JohnsonWyoming Supreme Court · 1934
  5. First National Bank v. CarsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1886

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API