Miller v. Cornwell
Michigan Supreme Court
Appeal from- Washtenaw. (Newton, J., presiding.) Bill to abate part of a mill-dam. Defendants appeal. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, J.
Complainant brought this suit in chancery to abate in part a mill-dam at Geddes, between Ann *271Arbor and Ypsilanti, on tbe Huron river, and to get damages. The dam is the same which was litigated in Blake v. Cornwell, 65 Mich. 467 (33 N. W. Rep. 803).
The case presented, so far as essential to indicate the ■controversy, is this: Complainant, in 1880, bought a farm on the north side of Huron river, lying in part north of a highway running between Ann Arbor and Ypsilanti, .and in part between the highway and the river. At this time a dam at G-eddes on the mill property in question was down, and…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Turner v. HartMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
- Blake v. CornwellMichigan Supreme Court · 1887
- Spalding v. KellyMichigan Supreme Court · 1887
3Cited by10 opinions
- Sheffield Car Co. v. Constantine Hydraulic Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1912
- Gulf Refining Co. v. PerryMichigan Supreme Court · 1942
- Fox v. JacobsMichigan Supreme Court · 1939
- Potter v. Saginaw Union Street RailwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
- Holcomb v. Alpena Power Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1917
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.