Legal Opinion

Burger v. First National Bank

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 9, 1927No. 26,965PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Harvey, J.:

This is an action to recover the amount of a claimed deposit in a bank. The jury returned a verdict for plaintiff, on which judgment was rendered. Defendant has appealed.

In the petition filed January 2, 1923, it was alleged in substance that, beginning many years ago, plaintiff and defendant, through Sam Smith, its then president, made an oral agreement that plaintiff would from time to time deposit in and loan to defendant various sums of money, to bear interest from the date of such deposit at the rate of eight per cent per annum; that…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Nassoiy v. . TomlinsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
  2. Taylor v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1923
  3. Beneke v. Bankers Mortgage Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1925
  4. Union Pacific Railroad v. SweetSupreme Court of Kansas · 1908
  5. Talcott v. First National BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1894

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Hoop v. Kansas Flour Mills Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1928
  2. Amino Bros. v. Twin Caney Watershed (Joint) District No. 34Supreme Court of Kansas · 1970
  3. Kerr v. CarsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1931
  4. Evans v. AylwardSupreme Court of Kansas · 1949
  5. Vigneron v. List & Hallett Construction Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1930

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API