Amino Bros. v. Twin Caney Watershed (Joint) District No. 34
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Harman, C.:
This is an action upon a construction contract for recovery of money for extra work performed. Defendants prevailed upon the theory of accord and satisfaction and plaintiff has appealed. The facts may be briefly stated.
Appellant, Amino Brothers Company, Inc., entered into a written contract with appellee watershed district whereby appellant was to construct an earthen multiple-purpose watershed dam in Chautauqua county, Kansas, on land owned by appellee Quivira Council, Boy Scouts of America, the latter agreeing to pay a portion of the cost…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Harrison v. HendersonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1903
- Lighthouse for the Blind v. MillerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1939
- Burger v. First National BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1927
- Hoop v. Kansas Flour Mills Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1928
3Cited by9 opinions
- Prather v. Colorado Oil & Gas Corp.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1975
- Sanders v. BirminghamSupreme Court of Kansas · 1974
- Lippert v. AngleSupreme Court of Kansas · 1974
- Crumpacker v. CrumpackerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1986
- Flett Construction Co., Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1972
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.