Legal Opinion
Petramala v. Scottsdale, City of
District Court, D. Arizona
Decided April 23, 2020No. 2:19-cv-00063Unknown
1Opinion
1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 Michael Petramala, ) No. CV-19-00063-PHX-SPL ) 9 ) Plaintiff, ) ORDER 10 ) ) vs. 11 ) ) 12 City of Scottsdale, ) ) 13 Defendant. ) ) 14 15 Before the Court is Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss (“Motion”) pursuant to Federal 16 Rule of Civil Procedure (“Rule”) 12(b)(6). (Doc. 18) For the following reasons, the Motion 17 will be granted. 18 I. Background 19 This case arises from a job application submitted by Michael Petramala (“Plaintiff”) 20 to the City of Scottsdale (“Defendant”). (Doc. 17) On December 11, 2017,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Evel Knievel Krystal Knievel v. Espn, a Subsidiary of Walt Disney, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Bates v. United Parcel Service, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- John C. Leisek v. Brightwood Corporation, an Active Oregon CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Cripe v. City of San JoseCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.