Legal Opinion
John C. Leisek v. Brightwood Corporation, an Active Oregon Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided January 22, 2002No. 00-35672PublishedCited by 167 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
TASHIMA, Circuit Judge.
John C. Leisek appeals from the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of Brightwood Corporation (“Brightwood”) on Leisek’s claims under the Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act of 1994 (“US-ERRA”), 38 U.S.C. §§ 4301-4333. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand.
I. BACKGROUND
Leisek was a full-time employee of Brightwood from December 10, 1991, until the effective date of the termination of his employment, July 3, 1996, last holding the position of quality assurance…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- National Labor Relations Board v. Transportation Management Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs v. Greenwich CollieriesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- William M. Gummo v. Village of Depew, New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by167 opinions
- James D. Wallace v. City of San Diego City of San Diego Police DepartmentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Townsend v. University of AlaskaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Velázquez-García v. Horizon Lines of Puerto Rico, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2007
- Nolan v. Heald CollegeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Nozzi v. Housing AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
162 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.