Legal Opinion
Guzman v. Denny's Inc.
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided February 4, 1999No. C-3-97-345PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
DLOTT, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on Defendant Denny Inc.’s 1 Motion for Summary Judgment (doc. # 24), pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Plaintiff Vincent Guzman, a paraplegic who uses a wheelchair to ambulate, filed this suit against the Denny’s alleging a violation of Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”), 42 U.S.C. § 12181, et seq., and common law negligence. 2 Subsequently, Defendant filed this Motion for Summary Judgment. Upon consideration of the facts and the law,…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Anthony A. Calderone, Clark Hornbaker, Plaintiffs-Counterclaim Defendants v. United States of America, Defendant-Counter-Claimant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1986
- Hambleton v. R.G. Barry Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1984
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Botosan v. Paul McNally RealtyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Parr v. L & L Drive-Inn RestaurantDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2000
- Dahlberg v. Avis Rent a Car System, Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 2000
- Californians for Disability Rights v. Mervyn's LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- Evans v. Midland Funding LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2008
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.