Hilt v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of Florida; William I. Grubb, Judge. Criminal prosecution by the United States against William T. Hilt and others. Judgment of conviction, and defendants bring error.
1Opinion of the Court
WALKER, Circuit Judge.
The plaintiffs in error were convicted on the first and second counts of the indictment. The first count charged that, at a time and place stated, the plaintiffs in error and two other persons “unlawfully and knowingly did combine, conspire, confederate, and agree to commit an offense against the United States; that is to say, to violate title 2 of the National Prohibition Act, in this, to wit, that the said” persons, naming them, “would then and there possess 'certain intoxicating liquors, to. wit, about two hundred cases of intoxicating liquor, contrary to the…
2Cited by19 opinions
- Mitchell v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1946
- Riggs v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1926
- Wishart v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1928
- Keen v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1926
- Middlebrooks v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1928
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.