Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Wishart v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided October 20, 1928No. 8048PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VAN VALKENBURGH, Circuit Judge.

Plaintiff in error, together with one Carl Anderson, one Francis McKee, and one Walter Wishart, a nephew of plaintiff in error, were indieted for conspiracy to violate the provisions of section 593 (b) of the Tariff Act of 1922 (19 USCA § 497), by importing and bringing into the United States certain intoxicating liquor, to wit, whisky and wine, contrary to law in the following respects, without reporting the same to an officer of the United States customs at the border, without securing a permit to bring the same into the United States, without unlading the…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Caminetti v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  2. United States v. CruikshankSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  3. Williamson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  4. Burton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
  5. Pettibone v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1893

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Ayers v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1932
  2. Nilva v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1954
  3. Tingley v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1929
  4. Brickey v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1941
  5. Thomas W. Banks v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1955

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API