Mitchell v. State
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
STAKELY, Justice.
We agree with the Court of Appeals that the indictment is fatally defective for failure to allege corrupt motive or criminal intent. There is nothing in the indictment to show that the defendants knew that any one of the voters in question did not live in Ward 3 or that they had not lived there long enough to entitle them to vote in that ward. On this point we think it well to say a few things in supplement of the opinion of the Court of Appeals.
In considering the sufficiency of the indictment, it should be noted at the outset that there is no code form for conspiracy which…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- United States v. CruikshankSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Doss v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
- Miles v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1891
- Doss v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1929
- Rumely v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1923
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- People v. MarshCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- Bowens v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1974
- People v. BernhardtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- Andrews v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1977
- Miller v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1977
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.