Legal Opinion

Keen v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided February 16, 1926No. 7039PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FARIS, District Judge.

Plaintiff in error, who was the defendant below, brought this writ of error to reverse convictions upon a certain information in two counts which charged him (for that be bad both sold and possessed borne brew beer) with violations of those provisions of the National Prohibition Act (Comp. St. Ann. Supp. 1923, § 10138% et seq.) which forbid unlawful sale and unlawful possession of intoxicating liquor.

Numerous grounds for reversal axe urged in the brief of plaintiff in error (hereinafter called defendant). Many of these are mere duplications, or statements of the…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Massey v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1922
  2. Rose v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1921
  3. Feinberg v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1924
  4. Williams v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1925
  5. Haussener v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1925

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Welch v. HudspethCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1942
  2. General Reinsurance Corp. v. Southern Surety Co. of Des MoinesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1928
  3. Johnson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1931
  4. Carnahan v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1929
  5. Stagecrafters Club, Inc. v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1952

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API