Legal Opinion
Betaseed, Inc. v. U & I Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided July 23, 1982No. Nos. 80-3490, 80-3514PublishedCited by 49 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ALARCON, Circuit Judge:
These appeals present, in the context of a private antitrust lawsuit, the familiar issue of whether the district court properly granted the parties’ respective motions for summary judgment. In its complaint, Be-taseed, Inc., alleges that U & I Inc. violated the Sherman Act’s proscription against tying arrangements, reciprocal dealings, and monopolization. 15 U.S.C. §§ 1, 2. Beta-seed also charges that U & I committed the common law torts of disparagement and interference with contractual relations. By counterclaim, U & I charges that Betaseed and the Washington Sugar…
2Cases cited54 opinions
- First Nat. Bank of Ariz. v. Cities Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Poller v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- United States v. Grinnell Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- United States v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1956
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by49 opinions
- Aydin Corporation, a Delaware Corporation v. Loral Corporation, a New York Corporation, and Conic Corporation, a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- Klamath-Lake Pharmaceutical Ass'n v. Klamath Medical Service BureauCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- Northrop Corp. v. McDonnell Douglas Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- Brokerage Concepts v. US Healthcare Inc (Part II)Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
- Southaven Land Co., Inc. v. Malone & Hyde, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1983
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.