Legal Opinion
Lost Tree Village Corporation v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided March 14, 2014No. 1:08-cv-00117PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
LETTOW, Judge.
This remanded takings case focuses on a determination of the economic value of the previously defined relevant parcel. Plaintiff, Lost Tree Village Corporation (“Lost Tree”) sought a wetlands fill permit from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (“the Corps”) for a 4.99 acre tract of land (“Plat 57”) bordering a cove on the Indian River in east central Florida. Lost Tree claims that the denial of that permit eliminated all economically viable use of Plat 57 and constituted a taking in contravention of the Takings Clause of the Fifth Amendment to the United States…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Christianson v. Colt Industries Operating Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Keystone Bituminous Coal Assn. v. DeBenedictisSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Lost Tree Village Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2015
- Boston Edison CompanyUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2021
- Lemon Bay Cove, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2020
- Lemon Bay Cove, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2022
- Lost Tree Village Corporation v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017