Legal Opinion

Morrison v. Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc.

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided July 20, 2004No. 03-71683PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

FEIKENS, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

Plaintiff, Christine Morrison, filed a Complaint for life insurance benefits in the amount of $1,000,000, plus statutory penalties, pursuant to the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq., against Defendants Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. (“M & M”), the Plan Administrator, J & H Marsh & McLennan, Inc. (”J & H), a subsidiary of M & M, Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. Employee Welfare Plan (“M & M Plan”), and Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, Inc. (“MetLife”), the insurer of the Plan.

Defendants…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Robert D. Sprague, Plaintiffs-Appellees/cross-Appellants v. General Motors Corporation, Defendant-Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Winnett v. Caterpillar, Inc.District Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2007
  2. Erbe v. Connecticut General Life InsuranceDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2010
  3. White v. Worthington Industries, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API