Legal Opinion

Sanford v. Sallan

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 16, 1933No. Docket No. 59, Calendar No. 37,132PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtWiest, J.

May 13, 1926, plaintiff leased certain premises in the city of Muskegon to defendant for tlie term of 11 years at a stated monthly rental. The lease provided:

“That no assignment, transfer, or subleasing shall relieve the tenant from his obligation of the payment of the rentals as herein contained.”

In April, 1928, defendant assigned the lease to the Busch-Sallan Jewelry Company, and that company paid the rent for a time. In 1932 plaintiff brought this suit to recover from defendant rent due under the lease. Defendant averred verbal permission to assign the lease, estoppel by receipt of rent…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Steinberg v. FineMichigan Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Smith v. ApplebaumMichigan Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Engel v. KlattMichigan Supreme Court · 1930

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Plaza Investment Co. v. AbelMichigan Court of Appeals · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API