Miller v. City of Woodburn
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.
Plaintiff earnestly contends that the court should have directed a verdict in his favor. His particular grievance is that, by reason of the acts of the defendant in increasing the flowage of waters in Ferrier Creek, he lost the use and rental of certain lands which he had intended to reclaim and let for the purpose of agriculture and horticulture.
Plaintiff is a riparian owner and is of course entitled to the rights and privileges of such owner. It is likewise the defendant’s right and privilege to make reasonable use of that slow, sluggish stream called Ferrier Creek. However, a municipal…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Paddock v. SomesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1890
- Johnston v. City of GalvaIllinois Supreme Court · 1925
- Simms v. SullivanOregon Supreme Court · 1921
- City of Aurora v. ReedIllinois Supreme Court · 1870
- Price v. High Shoals Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1909
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- LEVENE ET UX. v. City of SalemOregon Supreme Court · 1951
- Norwood v. Eastern Oregon Land Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1931
- United States v. FirchauOregon Supreme Court · 1963
- East St. Johns Shingle Co. v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1952
- Carte v. Flury Buick-Jeep, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1973
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.