Legal Opinion

Carte v. Flury Buick-Jeep, Inc.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided February 15, 1973PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTongue, J.

This is an action for damages arising from a transaction involving the purchase by plaintiff from defendant of a used 1962 Buick, into which the motor of plaintiff’s 1961 Buick was to be installed by defendant. Defendant appeals from a jury verdict and judgment for $750 general damages and $2,500 punitive damages.

Before considering defendant’s various assignments of error, including those involving the sufficiency of the evidence, it is necessary to review the facts, bearing in mind that in such an appeal plaintiff is entitled to the benefit of all favorable evidence and to all reasonable…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Mustola v. ToddyOregon Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Kuhnhausen v. StadelmanOregon Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Pelton v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Cronn v. FisherOregon Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Voyt v. Bekins Moving & Storage Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1941

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Roberts v. Mitchell Bros. Truck LinesOregon Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Shepherd v. Hub Lumber Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Emery v. StateOregon Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Koennecke v. Waxwing Cedar Products, Ltd.Oregon Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Snyder v. Espino-BrownOregon Supreme Court · 2011

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API