Legal Opinion

United States v. Firchau

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided April 17, 1963PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGoodwin, J.

This is a timber-trespass action under ORS 105.815. The sole question is whether mitigation of damages (when allowable) must be calculated before or after the damages are doubled pursuant to the statute.

ORS 105.810. “* * * [Whenever any per son, without lawful authority, wilfully injures or severs from the land of another any produce thereof or cuts down, girdles or otherwise injures or carries off any tree, timber or shrub on the land of another person, or of the state, county, United States or any public corporation, * * * in an action by such person * * * against the person committing such…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Gordon Creek Tree Farms, Inc. v. LayneOregon Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Kinzua Lumber Co. v. DaggettOregon Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Loewenberg v. RosenthalOregon Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Oregon & California Railroad v. JacksonOregon Supreme Court · 1891
  5. Miller v. City of WoodburnOregon Supreme Court · 1928

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Wernberg v. Matanuska Electric AssociationAlaska Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Denoyer v. LambOhio Court of Appeals · 1984
  3. Ken Hood Construction Co. v. Pacific Coast Construction, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
  4. Savelich Logging Company v. Preston Mill CompanyOregon Supreme Court · 1973
  5. Pedro v. JanuaryOregon Supreme Court · 1972

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API