Legal Opinion

Harrell v. Pineland Plantation, Ltd.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided November 22, 1999No. 25016Published

1Opinion of the Court

337 S.C. 313 (1999)

523 S.E.2d 766

William R. HARRELL, Respondent,

v.

PINELAND PLANTATION, LTD., Petitioner, and

Joseph Land and Company, Inc., Defendant.

No. 25016.

Supreme Court of South Carolina.

Heard March 16, 1999.

Decided November 22, 1999.

Rehearing Denied December 14, 1999.

Bert G. Utsey, III, of Sinkler & Boyd, P.A., of Charleston, for petitioner.

Carl E. Pierce and Joseph C. Wilson, IV, both of Hood Law Firm, of Charleston; and John E. Parker, of Peters, Murdaugh, Parker, Eltzroth & Detrick, P.A., of Hampton, all for respondent.

Joseph H. McGee, of Charleston, for defendant.

TOAL, Justice:

This…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Marchbanks v. Duke Power Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1939
  2. Vernon v. Harleysville Mutual Casualty Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1964
  3. Glass v. Dow Chemical Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1997
  4. Bickley Ex Rel. Estate of Bickley v. South Carolina Electric & Gas Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1972
  5. Harrell v. Pineland Plantation, Ltd.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1999

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API