Legal Opinion

Larson v. Orfield

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 27, 1923No. 23,332PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDibell, J.

The defendant D. -J. Orfield appeals from an order of the district court of St. Louis county, made September 23, 3922, appointing a receiver in a foreclosure action.

During foreclosure and until title has passed by the expiration of the period of redemption the landowner, under usual circumstances, is entitled to the possession of the mortgaged land. This is the necessary effect of the statute. G. S. 1913, § 8077. A receiver in foreclosure may be appointed on recognized equitable grounds. The proceeding which results in taking the possession from the owner is harsh and if not strictly limited…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Marshall & Ilsley Bank v. CadySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1899
  2. Cullen v. Minnesota Loan & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1895
  3. Nielsen v. HealdSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1922
  4. Donnelly v. ButtsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1917
  5. Justus v. FagerstromSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1920

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Nusbaum v. ShaperoMichigan Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Erickson-Hellekson-Vye Co. v. A. Wells Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
  3. Gardner v. W. M. Prindle & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1932
  4. Fidelity-Philadelphia Trust Co. v. WestSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
  5. Windom National Bank v. RenoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API