Legal Opinion
Crystal Byrd v. Aaron's Inc
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided April 16, 2015No. 14-3050PublishedCited by 238 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SMITH, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiffs Crystal and Brian Byrd bring this interlocutory appeal under Rule 23(f) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The Byrds brought a putative class action against Aaron’s, Inc. and its franchisee store Aspen Way Enterprises, Inc. (collectively “Defendants”), who they allege violated the Electronic Communications Privacy Act of 1986 (“ECPA”), 18 U.S.C. § 2511. Concluding that the Byrds’ proposed classes were not ascertainable, the District Court denied their motion for class certification. Because the District *159Court erred in applying our ascertainability…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. DukesSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Taylor v. SturgellSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Califano v. YamasakiSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by238 opinions
- Vince Mullins v. Direct Digital, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2015
- Universities Superannuation Scheme Ltd. v. Petróleo Brasileiro S.A. PetrobrasCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2017
- Neale v. Volvo Cars of North America, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2015
- Robert Briseno v. Conagra Foods, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- Dino Rikos v. The Procter & Gamble Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2015
233 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.