Legal Opinion

Mitchell v. Schimming & Eddins

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided September 15, 1932No. 1212PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGallagher, C. J.

This suit was instituted by A. C. Schim-ming and M. E. Eddins, composing the firmi of Schimming & Eddins, hereinafter called plaintiffs, against Rosa Mitchell, hereinafter called defendant, to recover the balance due on a promissory note executed and delivered to them by her and to foreclose a vendor’s lien on a certain house and let in the city of Marlin. , Defendant, on the 28th day of March, 1919, entered into a written contract with plaintiffs, by the terms of which she agreed to purchase from them the property aforesaid for the sum of $2,000, payable $100 cash, $12.50 on the 1st day of…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Phillips v. HerndonTexas Supreme Court · 1890
  2. P. J. Willis & Bro. v. McIntyreTexas Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Sullivan v. City of GalvestonTexas Commission of Appeals · 1931
  4. Rodgers-Wade Furniture Co. v. WynnCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1913
  5. Friedman-Shelby Shoe Co. v. DavidsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1916

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Dryden v. City National Bank of Laredo, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1984
  2. Curry v. O'DanielCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1937
  3. Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance v. PaustSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API