Mitchell v. Schimming & Eddins
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the CourtGallagher, C. J.
This suit was instituted by A. C. Schim-ming and M. E. Eddins, composing the firmi of Schimming & Eddins, hereinafter called plaintiffs, against Rosa Mitchell, hereinafter called defendant, to recover the balance due on a promissory note executed and delivered to them by her and to foreclose a vendor’s lien on a certain house and let in the city of Marlin. , Defendant, on the 28th day of March, 1919, entered into a written contract with plaintiffs, by the terms of which she agreed to purchase from them the property aforesaid for the sum of $2,000, payable $100 cash, $12.50 on the 1st day of…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Phillips v. HerndonTexas Supreme Court · 1890
- P. J. Willis & Bro. v. McIntyreTexas Supreme Court · 1888
- Sullivan v. City of GalvestonTexas Commission of Appeals · 1931
- Rodgers-Wade Furniture Co. v. WynnCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1913
- Friedman-Shelby Shoe Co. v. DavidsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1916
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Dryden v. City National Bank of Laredo, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1984
- Curry v. O'DanielCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1937
- Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance v. PaustSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1942