Legal Opinion

Curry v. O'Daniel

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 25, 1937No. 1795PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ALEXANDER, Justice.

This suit was brought to recover a balance of $800, and interest, alleged to be due on a promissory note, and to foreclose a. vendor’s lien retained to secure the payment of the same. The defendant pleaded the four-year statute of limitation (Vernon’s Ann.Civ.St. art. 5527). The trial court instructed a verdict for plaintiffs, and the defendant appealed.

The note sued on was for the sum of $2,-800, dated June 14, 1923, and payable in monthly installments of $25 per month and interest, the first installment being due and payable on or before the 1st day of September, 1923,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Mitchell v. Schimming & EddinsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Champlin Oil & Refining Company v. ChastainTexas Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Williams v. Cambridge Companies, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Bacher v. MadduxCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1977
  4. Champlin Oil & Refining Company v. ChastainTexas Supreme Court · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API