Legal Opinion
Friedman-Shelby Shoe Co. v. Davidson
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided November 15, 1916No. 1015PublishedCited by 9 opinions
Appeal from District Court, Potter County; Hugh L. Umphres, Judge. Action by the Friedman-Shelby Shoe Company against Alex Davidson. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiff appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtHuff, C. J.
This was an action, brought by the appellant, through its representative, against the appellee, Davidson, on the 'following guaranty contract:
“Friedman-Shelby Shoe Company, St. Louis, Mo. — Gentlemen: In compliance with your request for a guaranty of the tenor following to establish with you credit for E. E. Peoples Oo., Memphis, Texas and Clovis, N. M., and in consideration of one dollar to us in hand paid by you, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, I hereby unconditionally guarantee payment of whatever amount said party shall at any time be owing you, whether heretofore or…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Ryan v. MortonTexas Supreme Court · 1886
- Smith v. MontgomeryTexas Supreme Court · 1848
- Bullard v. NortonTexas Supreme Court · 1916
- Crane Co. v. SpechtNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
- Lamm & Co. v. ColcordSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Southwest Savings Association v. DunaganCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1965
- Linz v. Eastland CountyTexas Commission of Appeals · 1931
- El Paso Bank & Trust Co. v. First State Bank of EustisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1918
- City Nat. Bank v. Eastland CountyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928
- First Nat. Bank of El Paso v. International Sheep Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1930
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.