Legal Opinion

Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance v. Paust

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided February 13, 1942No. Nos. 32,925, 32,947PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Peterson, Justice.

This action was commenced on or about January 17, 1940, to recover a deficiency judgment upon notes secured by a real estate mortgage after exhaustion of the security by foreclosure. The defense is the statute of limitations. The action having been dismissed as to the defendant Jess W. Paust and no point having been raised with respect to such dismissal, we shall refer to Benjamin A. Paust as the defendant.

On August 3, 1925, plaintiff loaned to defendant the sum of $110,000, for which defendant executed and delivered to plaintiff eight promissory notes aggregating said…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Blumberg v. BirchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Hersey v. BennettSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1881
  3. Boynton v. SalingerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1910
  4. Robinson's Admr's v. AllisonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1860
  5. Wilson v. EigenbrodtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1882

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Holden v. Farwell, Ozmun, Kirk & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
  2. State Bank of Streeter v. NesterNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
  3. American Mutual Building & Loan Co. v. KeslerIdaho Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Weinstein v. Park Funding Corp.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API