Legal Opinion
Maxon Industries, Inc. v. State Compensation Insurance Fund
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 29, 1993No. B060356PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
EPSTEIN, J.
Insurance Code section 11873, subdivision (a) exempts the State Compensation Insurance Fund (the Fund) from most provisions of the Government Code: “[T]he fund shall not be subject to the provisions of the Government Code made applicable to state agencies generally or collectively, unless the section specifically names the fund as an agency to which the provision applies.” The California Tort Claims Act (Gov. Code, § 810 et seq.) is such a general statute. Although Insurance Code section 11873 makes several exceptions to the general exemption, there is none which brings the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Muskopf v. Corning Hospital DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
- People v. KingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
- Peterson v. San Francisco Community College DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
- People v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- City of Salinas v. Souza & McCue Construction Co.California Supreme Court · 1967
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Notrica v. State Compensation Insurance FundCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
- Security Officers Service, Inc. v. State Compensation Insurance FundCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
- Tricor California, Inc. v. State Compensation Insurance FundCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
- North Bay Construction Inc. v. City of PetalumaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
- Edward Carey Construction Co. v. State Compensation Insurance FundCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.