Legal Opinion
Canadian National Railway Co. v. United States
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided November 30, 1976No. 74-167PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
WADDY, District Judge.
I. The Procedural Background
This is an action by plaintiffs to set aside an Order of the Interstate Commerce Commission (the Commission) entered in an administrative general revenue proceeding identified as Ex Parte No. 267, Increased Freight Rates, 1970 and 1971. 1 The Order here challenged is dated August 6, 1973, and concerns freight rate increases authorized for railroads operating between points in Eastern Territory of the United States and points in Canada, and purports to be an interpretation or clarification of the Commission’s Report and Order…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Bowles v. Seminole Rock & Sand Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
- United States v. Pierce Auto Freight Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Aberdeen & Rockfish R. Co. v. Students Challenging Regulatory Agency Procedures (SCRAP)Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Gibson Wine Co., Inc. v. SnyderCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1952
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Mercury Motor Express, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- Genstar Chemical Ltd. v. Interstate Commerce CommissionDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1980
- Mercury Motor Express, Inc. And American Trucking Associations, Inc. v. United States of America and Interstate Commerce Commission, East Texas Motor Freight System and the Regular Common Carrier Conference of the American Trucking Associations, Inc. v. United States of America and Interstate Commerce CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- Genstar Chemical Ltd. v. Interstate Commerce CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1981
- Genstar Chemical Limited v. Interstate Commerce Commission and United States of America, Consolidated Rail Corporation, Intervenors. Genstar Chemical Limited v. Interstate Commerce Commission, Consolidated Rail Corporation, Genstar Chemical Limited v. Interstate Commerce Commission United States of America, Consolidated Rail Corporation, Norfolk and Western Railway Company, Chesapeake and Ohio Railway Company, Baltimore and Ohio Railroad Company, Western Maryland Railway Company, IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1981