Keys v. Eastman Kodak Co.
District Court, W.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER
LARIMER, District Judge.
This action, before me on the parties’ cross motions for summary judgment, is brought by the son of a former Kodak employee alleging violation of a section of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA), 29 U.S.C. § 1022. This section requires dissemination of a summary description of an employee benefit plan, to apprise participants and beneficiaries of their rights and obligations under the plan. The complaint also states a state law claim for estoppel. For the reasons stated below, summary judgment is hereby granted in…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Karavos Compania Naviera S. A. v. Atlantica Export Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
- Collision Plan Unlimited, Inc. v. Bankers Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1984
- Gloria Sladek v. Bell System Management Pension PlanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
- Francis v. United Technologies Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 1978
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Lloyd v. Crawford, III v. Jack A. RoaneCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1995
- Emma Anderson v. Flexel, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
- 16 Employee Benefits Cas. 2671, Pens. Plan Guide P 23879d Tony D. Coleman, as Sole Heir and Beneficiary of the Estate of Charlie D. Coleman, Deceased, Cross-Appellee v. Champion International Corporation/champion Forest Products, Cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
- Park v. Trustees of the 1199 SEIU Health Care Employees Pension FundDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2005
- Coleman Ex Rel. Estate of Coleman v. Champion International Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.