Legal Opinion

Gloria Sladek v. Bell System Management Pension Plan

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided July 31, 1989No. 88-1971PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GRANT, Senior District Judge.

The appellant, Gloria Sladek, filed the instant action in district court under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA” or “the Act”), 29 U.S.C. §§ 1001-1461, to set aside her husband’s pension election as voidable due to incompetency. Mr. Sladek, a qualified participant in an employee benefit plan governed by the Act, elected to forego the survivor annuity option offered by the defendant-plan, the Bell System Management Pension Plan (“the Plan”), in order to receive full pension benefits during his lifetime. The appellant brought this suit as a…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Shaw v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Capitol Leasing Company v. Federal Deposit Insurance CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
  2. Sykes v. Cook County Circuit Court Probate DivisionCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2016
  3. Brown v. Connecticut General Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1991
  4. Pens. Plan Guide P 23918c Raymond K. Panaras v. Liquid Carbonic Industries Corporation and Cbi Industries, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
  5. Pens. Plan Guide (Cch) P 23944l Rosemary Riordan v. Commonwealth Edison CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API