Legal Opinion
Lloyd v. Crawford, III v. Jack A. Roane
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided November 6, 1995No. 94-5192PublishedCited by 252 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NANCY G. EDMUNDS, District Judge.
The children of Dr. Lloyd Crawford, Jr., appeal the district court’s judgment that they are not entitled to proceeds from their father’s Money Purchase Pension Plan (“the Plan”). The district court held that the children do not have standing as beneficiaries to bring an action for benefits under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. § 1132. For the following reasons, we affirm the decision of the district court.
I
Dr. Crawford was a physician with the Pediatric Allergy Group until his retirement on or about December 31, 1991. As an…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by252 opinions
- Lloyd D. Alkire v. Judge Jane IrvingCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
- Colvin v. CarusoCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010
- Pr Diamonds, Inc. v. John P. ChandlerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
- Courie v. Alcoa Wheel & Forged ProductsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
- Robert Newman v. Federal Express CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
247 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.