Legal Opinion
Gettysburg School District 53-1 v. Larson
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided July 11, 2001No. 21750PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KONENKAMP, Justice.
[¶ 1.] In this administrative appeal, we review the Department of Labor’s ruling that the Gettysburg School District violated its reduction in force (RIF) policy. The school district contends that it was not required to comply with its RIF policy, but if it was, it followed the correct protocol. In addition, the district claims that the department was without jurisdiction to hear the grievance and without authority to reinstate the released teacher. Because the school district agreed to the RIF policy as part of its collective bargaining agreement with the teachers’ union,…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Glover v. Parole BoardMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
- In Re the Appeal of TempletonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
- Grand State Property, Inc. v. Woods, Fuller, Shultz, & Smith, P.C.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
- Wessington Springs Education Ass'n v. Wessington Springs School District 36-2South Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
- Fries v. Wessington School District No. 2-4South Dakota Supreme Court · 1981
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Edgar v. MillsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2017
- FB & I Building Products, Inc. v. Superior Truss & ComponentsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
- Hanson v. VERMILLION SCHOOL DISTRICT 13-1South Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
- Wilbur-Ellis Company v. Kevin EriksonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2024
- Council of Higher Education v. South Dakota Board of RegentsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.