Legal Opinion

People v. Mahach

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 30, 1923No. Crim. No. 666PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBurnett, J.

Defendants were convicted in the superior court of the county of Humboldt on September 1, 1922, of the crime of robbery. On September 5th judgment was pronounced sentencing them to the state prison. When arraigned for judgment they moved for a new trial, which motion was denied. Within two days thereafter they filed a “notice of appeal” with the clerk of said superior court. Within five days after said notice was filed T. H. Selvage, one of the attorneys for said defendants, presented in open court a written application for a transcript of the testimony in said cause, said application stating…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Banta v. SillerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Jergins v. SchenckCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Hamaker v. KeatingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Oats v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1899
  5. In re the Estate of SbarboroCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. BurchamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
  2. Shupe v. EvansCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
  3. People v. BurchamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
  4. People v. NicholsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API