Shupe v. Evans
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
COLLIER, J., pro tem.
pro This is an unlawful detainer action. The chronology of the case is as follows:
February 23, 1923, complaint in unlawful detainer filed, and summons issued.
February 24, 1923, complaint and summons served on defendant.
February 28, 1923, default of defendant entered.
March 3, 1923, trial had.
March 3, 1923, findings and conclusions of law filed.
March 5, 1923, judgment filed and entered.
March 5, 1923, writ of possession issued.
March 6, 1923, writ of possession served and satisfied.
March 6, 1923, demurrer filed.
March 12, 1923, demurrer dropped from calendar.
March 18, 1923,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Crouch v. H. L. Miller & Co.California Supreme Court · 1915
- In Re DeleonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
- Bonestell v. Western Automotive Finance Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1924
- Gillespie v. FenderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
- People Ex Rel. Foltz v. GiffordCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Thorson v. Western Development Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1967
- In Re MercereauCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
- SRO Housing v. DyceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
- SRO Housing v. DyceAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 2014
- Whitesell v. LaBergeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932