Legal Opinion
Doe v. Claremont McKenna Coll.
California Court of Appeal, 5th District
Decided August 8, 2018No. B281722PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBendix, J.
*1057John Doe appeals from the trial court's denial of his petition for a writ of administrative mandate. John sought to set aside his one-year suspension and other discipline imposed by respondent Claremont McKenna College (CMC) after a CMC review committee (the Committee) found that John had nonconsensual sex with Jane Roe, a student at a neighboring college.1 John argues that he was deprived of a fair hearing because Jane did not appear, thus denying John and the Committee an opportunity to question her and assess her credibility. John further claims that CMC did not provide adequate notice,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- John Doe v. Univ. of CincinnatiCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2017
- Doe v. Regents of the University of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
- Doe v. University of Southern CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
- Shoemaker v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
- John A. v. San Bernardino City Unified School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Doe v. Allee, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- Doe v. Regents of the Univ. of Cal., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- John Doe v. Univ. of S. Cal., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Doe v. Univ. of S. Cal., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- John Doe v. Westmont Coll., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.