Legal Opinion

John Doe v. Univ. of Cincinnati

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided September 25, 2017No. 16-4693PublishedCited by 84 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GRIFFIN, Circuit Judge.

On September 6, 2015, University of Cincinnati students John Doe and Jane Roe 1 engaged in sex at John Doe’s apartment. John contends that the sex was consensual; Jane claims it was not. No physical . evidence supports either student’s version.

After considerable delay, defendant University of Cincinnati (“UC”) held á disciplinary hearing on Jane Roe’s sexual assault charges against graduate student John Doe. Despite Jane Roe’s failure to appear at the hearing, the University found John Doe “responsible” for sexually assaulting Roe based upon her previous hearsay…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. California v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. Goss v. LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 1975

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by84 opinions

  1. John Doe v. David BaumCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2018
  2. John Doe v. Miami Univ.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2018
  3. Haidak v. Univ. of Mass-AmherstCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2019
  4. Roe v. St. John's UniversityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2024
  5. John Doe v. Belmont Univ.District Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2018

79 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API