Legal Opinion
John Doe v. Westmont Coll.
California Court of Appeal, 5th District
Decided April 23, 2019No. 2d Civil No. B287799PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtTangeman, J.
*372*625Jane Roe accused John Doe1 of sexual assault while the two were students at Westmont College. Westmont's Student Conduct Panel (the Panel) determined that the evidence supported Jane's accusation. It suspended John for two years.
John challenged the Panel's decision in a petition for writ of administrative mandate. ( Code Civ. Proc.,2 § 1094.5.) The trial court determined that Westmont did not provide John a fair hearing, and granted his petition. Westmont contends: (1) John received a fair hearing, and (2) substantial evidence supports the Panel's decision. Because we disagree with…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Doe v. Regents of the University of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
- Doe v. University of Southern CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
- Doe v. Claremont McKenna Coll., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Doe v. Allee, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- Doe v. Regents of the Univ. of Cal., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- State v. JokCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2019
- Ayach v. The Regents of the U. of Cal.California Court of Appeal · 2024
- Boermeester v. CarryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2024
- Boermeester v. CarryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2020
- Boermeester v. CarryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2024
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.