Legal Opinion

In re Windjammer Hospitality

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided April 11, 2001No. 00-446PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Appellant Windjammer Hospitality Group (Windjammer) appeals from a decision of the environmental court which held that split lots must conform to the minimum lot frontage requirements required for each district in which they are located. On appeal, Windjammer contends that a split lot, one that lies in more than one zoning district, conforms to the applicable zoning bylaws as long as it maintains minimum lot frontage on one street. We affirm.

This case arises out of the City of South Burlington’s denial of Windjammer’s application to subdivide a 54-acre parcel which it currently leases, with a…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Appeal of WeeksSupreme Court of Vermont · 1998
  2. City of Rutland v. KeifferSupreme Court of Vermont · 1964
  3. Granger v. Town of WoodfordSupreme Court of Vermont · 1998
  4. McLaughry v. Town of NorwichSupreme Court of Vermont · 1981
  5. Boulter Brothers Construction Co. v. Zoning Board of AppealsMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1998

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. All Star Group, LLC Subdivision Permit Denial - Decision on Motion (Summary Judgment)Vermont Superior Court · 2021
  2. Champlain Oil Co., Inc. CU ApplicationVermont Superior Court · 2010
  3. Myers 2-Lot Subdivision Final PlatVermont Superior Court · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API