Legal Opinion

Granger v. Town of Woodford

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided March 10, 1998No. 97-200PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Plaintiff landowners Dorothy and Raymond Granger appeal a Bennington Superior Court order granting defendant Town of Woodford’s motion for summary judgment. Landowners contend that the court erred in concluding that town’s decision to establish a commercial zone was a constitutional exercise of town’s police powers. We affirm.

On March 1,1994, a majority of town’s electorate voted to change the zoning classification of a .82 acre parcel of land owned by David and Rosalie Wright from “Rural Residential” to “Roadside Commercial.” This parcel of land is used to operate an automobile repair shop…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Madden v. Omega Optical, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1996
  2. Bishop v. Town of BarreSupreme Court of Vermont · 1982
  3. Smith v. Town of St. JohnsburySupreme Court of Vermont · 1988
  4. Galanes v. Town of BrattleboroSupreme Court of Vermont · 1978
  5. Watkins Trustee v. SedberryTennessee Supreme Court · 1927

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Springfield Hydroelectric Co. v. CoppSupreme Court of Vermont · 2001
  2. In Re Margaret Susan P.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1999
  3. Springfield Terminal Railway Co. v. Agency of TransportationSupreme Court of Vermont · 2002
  4. Dicks v. JensenSupreme Court of Vermont · 2001
  5. Hoeker v. Department of Social & Rehabilitation ServicesSupreme Court of Vermont · 2000

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API