Quickel v. Quickel
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtSharp, J.
Testator devised his realty to his wife “to have and to hold or dispose of as she desires.” Thereafter he appended the provision that if any heir survive “it shall be his”; if no heir survive, he desired that his brother Tom have the property.
The ruling of the Superior Court that the wife acquired a fee simple estate in the testator’s land is in accord with the decisions of this Court. This devise comes within the oft-stated general rule of testamentary construction that an unrestricted or general devise of real property, to which is affixed, either specifically or by implication, an…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Carroll v. HerringSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1920
- WACHOVIA BANK AND TRUST COMPANY v. WolfeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
- St. James v. Bagley.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
- Roane v. . RobinsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
- Morris v. MorrisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Misenheimer v. MisenheimerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
- Adcock v. PerrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
- Leonard v. DillardCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
- Seifert v. SandersWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1987
- Adcock v. PerryCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.