Legal Opinion

Adcock v. Perry

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided July 7, 1981No. 809SC800PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MORRIS, Chief Judge.

Initially, we are concerned with appellants’ disregard of the Appellant Rules of Procedure. Rule 10(b)(2), N.C. Rules of Appellate Procedure, requires an appellant to set out a separate exception to the making or omission of each finding of fact or conclusion of law which is to be assigned as error.

Rule 28(b)(3), N. C. Rules of Appellate Procedure, provides:

Immediately following each question [in the appellate brief] shall be a reference to the assignments of error and exceptions pertinent to the question, identified by their numbers and by the pages of the printed record…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Carroll v. HerringSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1920
  2. Peele v. FinchSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
  3. Clark v. ConnorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  4. Coppedge v. CoppedgeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  5. Morris v. MorrisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Adcock v. PerrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  2. Adcock v. PerrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API