Legal Opinion

Misenheimer v. Misenheimer

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 30, 1985No. 368PA83PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARTIN, Justice.

Isam R. Misenheimer was murdered by his son John.1 After providing for payment of his debts, funeral and other expenses, *693Isam’s will left his residuary estate to his eight surviving children, including John, in equal shares. John has two sons. The question presented by this action for a declaratory judgment is how to distribute John’s share in light of the “slayer statute,” article 3 of chapter 31A of the General Statutes of North Carolina, which bars one who “willfully and unlawfully” kills another as principal or accessory from sharing in the other’s estate.

Articles I and II…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Ex Parte GarlandSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
  2. Cummings v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
  3. United States v. LovettSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  4. State v. MisenheimerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  5. Wilson v. FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH, REIDSVILLE, NCSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Early v. BowenCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994
  2. Lee v. BarksdaleCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
  3. Gibboney v. Wachovia Bank, N.A.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
  4. Prudential Insurance Co. of America v. AthmerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999
  5. Woolbert v. Kimble Glass, Inc.District Court, W.D. North Carolina · 1999

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API